Subject:
|
Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Oct 2001 22:37:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
(snipped)
> Most criminals aren't stupid. Given a choice against going up against an armed
> or unarmed victim, most will logically choose the unarmed victim.
Most criminals aren't psychic, either. So how can they tell if someone is
armed or not?
They just try their luck. If the victim is not armed, fine; if it is, too
bad, one person will probably get hurt.
> I sure would if I were a criminal!
And what about you, how would you tell the difference if you were a criminal?
Pedro
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
173 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|