Subject:
|
Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 00:46:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
538 times
|
| |
| |
Pedro Silva wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
>
> (snipped)
>
> > Most criminals aren't stupid. Given a choice against going up against an armed
> > or unarmed victim, most will logically choose the unarmed victim.
>
> Most criminals aren't psychic, either. So how can they tell if someone is
> armed or not?
Simple - they go to areas where weapons are hard to *lawfully* get. Statistics
prove this out - the easier it is to *lawfully* get a gun, hence the more *lawful*
citizens have them, the lower the "bad" crimes in the area.
> They just try their luck.
No, they often find easier pickings in other areas.
> If the victim is not armed, fine; if it is, too
> bad, one person will probably get hurt.
Yes, and if it's the criminal, I sure won't feel bad about it.
> > I sure would if I were a criminal!
>
> And what about you, how would you tell the difference if you were a criminal?
I'd do my crime in places where it's hard to *lawfully* get a gun.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
173 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|