To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *12811 (-10)
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) I hope to god that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats will either. What I hope is that all groups, parties, and individuals make their voices heard so that we can go forward as a country united rather than straggling and unsupportive of (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) Lar, in this crises, good or bad, the "two big parties" in power hold the only opinions that will be acted upon. While many people and groups may hold opinions, the decisions about to be made will be made by those in power. A very simple (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: "Kill 'em all"
 
This brings to mind the only good (if morbid and slightly hysterical) laugh I've had all week. On the radio Wednesday morning as I was going to (coming home from?) work, the local DJ's were speaking with a psychologist/grief counselor. He was saying (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  The unknown author of this suffering.
 
(I found this on a comic book website and thought some folks here might want to read it as well, the subject title is taken from the first paragraph) This article was written by Leonard Pitts Jr. of the Miami Herald: They pay me to provide words (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  My God...my truth...my pain...
 
This is going to be quite personal I think, and purhaps quite long. It will very likely not be worded well. What I have to say may enrage a few of you, but I am offering my thoughts to the public debate because I am young and still have room for (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
Ross Crawford wrote, quoting Harry Brown: (...) The US did not achieve its objective because it was defeated in battle, which doesn't prove its reasoning for being there was flawed. (...) The US went to Panama to remove its two-bit dictator, which (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) It's Lar, not LAR. Please keep it straight, if you would, ED. Thanks. (...) And when I explained why it isn't, you foamed. I foamed back. Sorry. Do only the two big parties even *get* to have an opinion? Blech. Thank you LFB for the link to HB (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP SPAM statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) I welcomed it. I think Larry and Ed may be splitting semantic hairs over whether or not it is pandering (or promotional), but I'm glad to know what their stance is. The one thing they say that I find myself agreeing with most is the opinion (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) I'm certainly not the one raving - LAR is. I simply stated that the LP issuing a statement is pandering for self promotoion. (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
 
(...) Then why are you raving about it? Chris (24 years ago, 15-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR