To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *1186 (-20)
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) Yes, we all have microwaves! I can throw mine a good 20 feet. :') (...) anything. (...) Libertarianism infringes on the rights of non-libertarians. (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) Hmm... the bible belt - notice how far away a belt is from your brain, unless your brains are located in your posterior. Why do Jerry Falwell and Jesse Helms come to mind? (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) Er, uh, yeah. Yeah, that's the ticket. That's *just* what I meant. And I mean everything I say. Why, it was just last week that I was telling this to my wife, Morgan Fairchild, whom I've seen naked....;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) AUUUGH! the bible belt. been smacked with that one many a time. (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) No puns, darnit. Not a single one. Take it to .pun or it could get ugly. <jk> (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) ^^^^^^^^ Someone who demands proof before he is willing to believe in an anthem? James (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
Christopher, If you are *that* desperate and an antheist, I'll take you on...;-) [1] [1] mmm...although you *are* in the Bible Belt... -John (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) Only if they can build them from Technic. (...) Except annoy non Libertarians. (...) Prove it. Post the URL to pictures or shut up, buddy. (...) Yup. perl and Java are the two worst languages ever developed, except for all the rest. (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: What happened?
 
(...) Works for me; Clinton's already in the White House... (...) Also fine by me, considering what we Implementors are told about Libertarians. ...And about the Illuminatti. ...And about the Munchkins of Zurich. ...And about Betty Crocker and the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  What happened?
 
OK, so I got used to l.0-t.d being the big time sink of the day, and now I miss it. Come on guys, say something stu^h^h^h controversial. OK, I'll start. Let's see... All homosexuals have the right to own nuclear weapons. Libertarians have all the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
(...) Okay... In a 1st grade class, the teacher is asking students to come to the front and say what their parents do for a living. One little boy says, "my daddy is a fireman!" One little girl says, "my daddy is a doctor!" And so on...until one (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
(...) And that, my friends, brings us to the root of the problem: the wretched tort system in America, and the money-grubbing swine known as attorneys...[1] [1] Good time and place for favorite lawyer joke;-) I'll get the ball rolling. What is the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
(...) Nah, why would he care about that? He just needs to squeez the $2K for his services out of the situation, gravy for the 'injured' doesn't matter at all. (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
(...) Of course if he's lucky, he'll get money out of your insurance company. If he's real lucky, he could win a judgement which would force you to liquidate your Lego and garnish future wages. And if certain people have their way, you would no (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
(...) I doubt this..he didn't go to the hospital after the wreck. (...) The statute of limitations is about to run out so I guess that's why I'm getting slamed with it now. How wretched is humanity! (...) The good news here is that my insurance (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Stunningly ignorant people
 
(...) And you wonder why your system is setup like little Big Brother? Maybe they were color-blind. Steve (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: stunningly geedy people
 
Hmmm ... How can he PROVE that the little run in with you TWO YEARS ago caused his injury? Does he have evidence that can prove this? I find this on the humorous side, since for the last two years he hasn't said a word about it. Unfortunately, you (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  stunningly geedy people
 
Today I learned I am being sued because almost two years ago I barely bumped the back of a guys explorer. I hit the part that holds the trailer hitch; there was no hitch on there though. It was pouring rain and when I stopped at the light I slid a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Stunningly ignorant people
 
(...) Yeah... Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 13-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Stunningly ignorant people
 
Yes, computer _LITERATE_ people should know that reading an e-mail is different than opening attachments ... ...but ... The IQ of the world is constant, the population keeps growing. -Lee. PS, I'm a software programmer/analyst. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR