 | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Adrian Egli
|
| | | (...) Most of what was posted I do agree with- this group has clone brands as its topic and if one doesn't like clones, (BTW, I don't) then one shouldn't post b####'n here. BUT, that doesn't mean one cannot read what is posted. Here is my reason for (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) This is the group designated for clone discussion, pro or con. It should stay polite, just as with any group, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't have the right to make negative statements about clones here. They should, however, be aware (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | Y'all are ignoring the obvious fact that you never made a person talk in a particular place at a party because he was drinking Pepsi. You didn't for example say: "Go talk in the bathroom while you are drinking Pepsi." There's a personal and slightly (...) (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Mmm, troll food. Go find a site that is dedicated to old Ford trucks - note: NOT old trucks in general, but Ford specifically - and see how freely they intersperse their discussions about Chevy. This is a Lego site. Suffer. James (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | | | (...) Spaceballs the flame-thrower, the kids love that one. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Mike Kollross
|
| | | | (...) If you were at a Coke party, for Coke drinkers, planned by Coke drinkers you would most certainly be asked to leave. Would that surprise you or would you refuse to leave and instead spout the virtues of Pepsi to people who are clearly Coke (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) But if that Coke party (which I would happily attend, being a decades-long fan of that brand) billed itself as "The Friendliest Beverage Party Around,' then it might be a trifle off-putting if many of those Coke-fans expressed ovewhelming (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | Dave! I think the previous poster may be a.k.a. "MK-Ultra"(?) on bricklink. He's trolling for me here because I mentioned something about clones on the bricklink forum yesterday and I guess that bothered him and Mike P (surprise!). Like some weird (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Mike Kollross
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes all hail Satan. :) The cross burning and zealot referneces were a nice touch. :) Seriously. I'm not burning clones. I just think they do not have a large a place on lugnet or Bricklink as Hop-Frog would like. Lego sites dedicated to Lego (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego —Mike Kollross
|
| | | | (...) This was me making a bit of a dig. It was in reference to an earlier post. I won't argue that MB :) are getting better and that I have picked up sets and seriously considered buying. I understand the draw of a set heavy with light grey 2x4 (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | | |
