 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) **sighs** I guess when one's hobby is a toy, there will be children involved! :) Personally, I think it's bad for the overall AFOL community. I'll grant you, (A) I'm still sort of new to the community (even with 37 years of LEGO under my (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I was recently involved in something similar, when I took exception to the characterization of one site (Site A) by members of another, much larger site (Site B). Frankly, the postings struck me as petty and really kind of snide, and I posted (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) Well, here's an important distinction: who's doing the saying? And in what capacity? Let's say AFOLS.com is run by Mortimer. And a frequent visitor to the AFOLS.com is Jezebelle. And there's another site called LEGOGEEKS.com, which they hate. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure right or wrong have much to do with it, given human nature. Right now, I could easily name three pairs of LEGO-related web sites where your example could apply, including one I run. So I don't think this is anything new. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I don't see what is wrong with it so long as it's not taken to extremes. Tim (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
While not naming any specific sites, I would be interested in hearing the Community's thoughts on whether you think it right or wrong for one AFOL site to talk about another AFOL site. For purposes of this discussion, we will assume that by talk I (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Test Lugnet 3
|
|
Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Who needs a kitchen anyway?
|
|
I already have four of them in the livingroom and one in my PC room, so I can't possibly make room for yet another. But the price is so low, and this chance just won't come again. What am I to do? Ah, what the...! (URL) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Spider-man 3?
|
|
(...) 6 of the new sets are out now. New style Symbiote, Spiderman, Sandman, Young Green Goblin, and Ravage are out. A number of the kits are what Mega calls super-tech Mecha. They combine super-tech elements (done in weird bionical style character (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-07, to lugnet.licensed.spiderman, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) and Rosses... ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
