 | | Re: indignant behavior
|
|
(...) Tut tut, John. That's bordering on incivility. Think of the children reading this. (19 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Any WordPress gurus out there?
|
|
(...) Hi Mike, From what I understand, that setting will not affect spambots. I think the only way to reduce the spam comments (especially pingback & trackback) is to activate the Askimet plugin (comes with recent WP) and possibly also install a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Any WordPress gurus out there?
|
|
I am running WordPress for the NCLTC and NCLUG web sites and even though I have turned on the setting which requires registration to comment, I still receive a bunch of spam comments. Anyone know how this is happening and what I can do to prevent (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
|
(...) Of course this should be all non-integer cubes are impossible... Tim (19 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Smallest cube ever!?
|
|
(...) hmmm. I have a suspicion that most non-integer cubes are impossible because of the way the surfaces can be constructed. Each side of a surface must be constructed out of I + 1/5 J plate units (I and J integer) since we can only make them out (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | This is a test post
|
|
Testing! :O) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
This is directed to all people who would like to see sanctions against Ross. (...) I am so sorry that I haven't received Ross' and Eric's emails regarding this matter (both sent before Bob's posting), because if I would have received one of them or (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Gimme a break. This is a prank gone wrong, not an abuse of power. Deleting all of a member's posts, or breaking links in a way that couldn't be restored, that would be an abuse. This was actually a little bit funny (and a little mean, I (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) So it's OK for you to abuse administrative privilege, as long as only one or two people are bothered by it? Especially if one of the two is a person that a significant people on LUGNET feel it's OK to bully? I just have to post here to say I (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) No. The admins will determine if I crossed any line, and take action as necessary. (...) Firstly, that has nothing to do with the point I was making about wanting ALL admins to be "in the loop" when someone "contacts admin". And secondly, the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) A point which is still apparently lost on you? (...) So you sent e-mail to the admins, and then in the absence of a response you assumed that you had administrative approval to alter somebody else's content? No problem. Sure. (...) Under the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Well, that's even worse, and should be fixed. (...) No, that's a different point entirely. (...) I don't think anyone had a problem with Dave reverting the pics, do you? (...) At least (URL) one person did>, and preferred to email the admins (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: test
|
|
(...) Reply Test (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
test (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | This is just a test
|
|
(URL) Legway> (URL) NXTway> (URL) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Snipped (...) No, they are AFOLs. Just because I am geographically challenged to them, doesnt mean I didnt actually make the drive (numerous times). Snipped more... (...) Indeed. (...) Exactly (*grins*). Janey "Delusional, Red Brick" (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) It's not shocking, just unclear. Not that it really matters, but these friends with whom you joked-- they aren't AFOLs I assume, because presumabley they are the ones with whom you are geographically challenged. Perhaps you joked with (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) You are wrong. I think I would know, since I wrote that, and I was the one joking around. The whole thing started as a joke in real life, because I am geographically challenged from other "local" groups. You know, friends joking... real people (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Heckel wrote: <snip> (...) I've never posted to Brickshelf--do I have to leave LUGNET? <snip> Dave K (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Nice dodge. It took about two minutes to look through your Lugnet post history. (...) This begs the question: Why post on a lego forum if not to share your lego things? (...) I'm not asking you to post every last MOC to Brickshelf, but you (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
