To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53648 (-20)
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Where was the injustice? Jude (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Allister McLaren wrote: <snip> (...) You misread me, sir. I'm not 'taking Eric seriuously'. I am, however, taking injustice seriously. As should you. As should anyone. The second we allow injustices to slide, then, well, (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: omnipotent behavior
 
(...) Oodalalee! All Hail Larry! ===...=== JOHN (Larritarian since 1999) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)  
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) Go figure; another Dave! Nice of you to drop by, Dave! What, did your a team of small girls in Africa send you a "heads up" of mirth and frivolity? :-) I have a question for you if you have the time. John "Bob" Neal (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I never said it was a very good joke, nor necessarily accurate. When you mentioned community policing earlier in the thread, it just struck an ironic chord with me. ... (...) Well, at least someone's' taking this thread, and indeed Eric, (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: DST sucks! (was: malicious behavior)
 
(...) I feel his pain. It happens here in Arizona too: (URL) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
 
  Re: omnipotent behavior
 
(...) I firmly believe lar has a team of small girls in Africa tapping away on laptops that read the entire internets and give him a daily report. It's the only possible explanation for his apparent ability to be everywhere. (...) The entire world (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to. (...) That's one way, but not the ONLY way. Real or otherwise. (...) I was never asked to verify anything - I was simply asked "What makes you think he is still among the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: DST sucks! (was: malicious behavior)
 
(...) Sorry Ross, I didn't know you had it so bad. (URL) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) You can't assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET. The only real way to know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each week. Sure, there are (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: DST sucks! (was: malicious behavior)
 
(...) LOL ummmm shhhh, don't mention DST when talking to an Australian ;) ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Ross, The difference is Tom uses a calendar that has months that are 20 days long on average. Those crazy Americans, first they mess up DST now they have a new calendar. Jude (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) You keep out of this, Harry. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) OK. I thought I could assume people would read my question in the context of the current thread, but I guess that was a rash assumption. So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case? ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) Until a few years ago, I was able to answer "Yes, he is!" whenever someone said "Bob's your uncle!" ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) "Regularly chiming in every few months" over a period of 6 months means chiming in twice, spaced "regularly" over the time, i.e at 3 months and 6 months. Chiming in twice in the last 6 months could mean chiming in on Day One and Day Two, and (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
(...) Well, he could have used Tom, Dick, or Harry, but then I would have had to pipe up ;-) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) "Good evening!" JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Hmmmm *tempted* Then remembers just how much trouble I am already in, and silently walks away. Janey "More innocent than she appears, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) And in doing so missed the savory "Lady of the lake" bit. Really, I can't keep lofting these puffballs into your court and not have you put them away! (...) No, Minifig, my little yellow friend, now is not the time for "nevermind".... A (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR