Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:29:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9060 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case?
|
You can’t assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is
reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET. The only real way to
know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each week.
Sure, there are regular lurkers, but you have no tangible way to verify that.
Further, merely because LUGNET is a public forum in no way means that the entire
world is privy to what is said in it.
Even Compartmentalized Dorks [1] who only subscribe to a particular NG on
LUGNET can be clueless as to what is going on on LUGNET.
HTH,
JOHN
[1] Not intended as a disparagement, but as an acknowledgment of an old,
inside joke.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to. (...) That's one way, but not the ONLY way. Real or otherwise. (...) I was never asked to verify anything - I was simply asked "What makes you think he is still among the (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: omnipotent behavior
|
| (...) I firmly believe lar has a team of small girls in Africa tapping away on laptops that read the entire internets and give him a daily report. It's the only possible explanation for his apparent ability to be everywhere. (...) The entire world (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Actually, there ARE other ways-- ish-- but they're not easy! And they're not necessarily open to everyone. For instance, an admin could check on the Lugnet server to see how many times he's logged in. But it's not public information. You can (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) OK. I thought I could assume people would read my question in the context of the current thread, but I guess that was a rash assumption. So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case? ROSCO (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
