Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:42:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9417 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case?
|
You can’t assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is
reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET.
|
I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to.
| |
The only real way
to know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each
week.
|
That’s one way, but not the ONLY way. Real or otherwise.
| |
Sure, there are regular lurkers, but you have no tangible way to
verify that.
|
I was never asked to verify anything - I was simply asked “What makes you think
he is still among the populace that reads LUGNET?” (Note spelling correction - I
don’t think anyone here is a tree.)
| |
Further, merely because LUGNET is a public forum in no way means that the
entire world is privy to what is said in it.
|
Agreed. But irrelevant.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Conversely, you make my point. If he doesn't reply to something, we can't assume he's read it, and it would be off his radar, or as I put it, "behind his back." Your initial point was, because he posts now and then, he's around and aware of (...) (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Don't assume. I have only read what is in o-t-d, I have not gone back to the original thread, and judging by what I've seen in here, I don't feel the need to waste the time. (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You can't assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET. The only real way to know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each week. Sure, there are (...) (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
