Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:17:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9530 times
|
| |
|
|
Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
> >
> > > So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case?
> > You can't assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is
> > {reading} or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET.
>
> I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to.
Don't assume. I have only read what is in o-t-d, I have not gone back
to the original thread, and judging by what I've seen in here, I don't
feel the need to waste the time.
--
Tom Stangl
* http://www.vfaq.com/
* DSM Visual FAQ home
* 90 Talon AWD
* http://www.vfaq.net/
* Prius Visual FAQ Home
* 04 Prius AM #7
* 06 Prius NL #7
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to. (...) That's one way, but not the ONLY way. Real or otherwise. (...) I was never asked to verify anything - I was simply asked "What makes you think he is still among the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
