Subject:
|
Re: malicious behavior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:50:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9492 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > >
> > > > So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case?
> > > You can't assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is
> > > {reading} or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET.
> >
> > I think you can assume that he is aware of whatever he replied to.
>
> Don't assume.
Well I guess if he has a group of African girls with laptops replying for him
then maybe he is unaware of what he has replied to.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Don't assume. I have only read what is in o-t-d, I have not gone back to the original thread, and judging by what I've seen in here, I don't feel the need to waste the time. (18 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
