| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
So please explain how that difference applies in this particular case?
|
You can’t assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is
reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET. The only real way
to know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each
week. Sure, there are regular lurkers, but you have no tangible way to
verify that.
|
I firmly believe lar has a team of small girls in Africa tapping away on laptops
that read the entire internets and give him a daily report. It’s the only
possible explanation for his apparent ability to be everywhere.
| |
Further, merely because LUGNET is a public forum in no way means that the
entire world is privy to what is said in it.
|
The entire world doesn’t need to. Only lar, who, as far as I know, has a
computer, an internet connection, and an evident, if possibly fading, knowledge
of Lugnet.
| |
Even Compartmentalized Dorks [1] who only subscribe to a particular NG on
LUGNET can be clueless as to what is going on on LUGNET.
|
Or just generally clueless...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You can't assume that because he has posted on LUGNET a few times, he is reading or aware of anything that is going on on LUGNET. The only real way to know if someone is a regular reader is if that person posts often each week. Sure, there are (...) (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
183 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
