To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *53593 (-20)
  Re: Figure it out
 
(...) You still as a fellow Lego Fan, took another LUGNET member's pictures repeatedly from Brickshelf to use in a mean spirited manner is completely uncool for what ever your reasons. Until You, Kevoh, Jude and Soren used my pictures to wage your (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) You're doing a great job there, Dave. This is the sort of input that Lugnet's been sorely lacking since ++Lar abandonded the community. You just need to turn a few more catchphrases now and then and your transformation will be complete. (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)  
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
--snip-- I think this entire argument can be put down to a disagreement over what evidence is applicable to the use in the argument. I think you're as unlikely to convince me that your choices are valid as I am to convince you that mine are. We are (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I think you should start writing in English first. (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Once again obfuscation--my replies to your comments-- 'I’ve stayed out of this thread until this comment. There is no evidence that Eric is in anyway better than this. There is plenty of evidence that he is not. Just because people get a rise (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) I stand before your awesomeness. I yeild oh great brick master Tim. For your awesomeness is so great how can I build ye. The bricks are to small, I am afraid I can not compete. \\\...\\\ (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) --snip-- (...) If you think that Eric deserves an apology then perhaps you should apologise to him. Since you had as much to do with the original issue as I did then you owe him an apology as much as I do. Furthermore I've never argued that (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) (*this is such a joke, I am just having fun in the way I transcribe the events*) Righgght! Brilliant, and upon further research one can plainly see, that another party, usual suspect, utters a complaint unto Eric Sophie's person, there by (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) Why bother? I was legally allowed to use them and given your typical behaviour I find it very unlikely you would volunteer to let me use them to poke fun at you. You can twist and turn all you like but what you did was morally wrong in my (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) I couldn't give a rats ass about DMCA, 'fair usage', 'freedom of speech' or '1st ammendment rights' or whatever people are going on about now--it's all obfuscating the actual issue. (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) -Snip- (...) -snip- (...) I bow to your awesomeness. Ever think to ask for the images? That was "Outside" LUGNET, now What'd I do "On" LUGNET? Again, bowing to your awesomeness. (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) And the American Government... (URL) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Eric, The last thing you did wrong was to submit a DMCA image against me for an image the wasn't breaching your copyright. The image was legal. As I have explained to you by email it is called Fair Use for parody. That happened a few days ago (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
Tim, what was the last thing I did wrong? Refresh our memories and back up your story. Then tell me what any of this has to do with you or the Technic Side bar and Ross's actions. Since you like to molest my images, having broke the law several (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help! Help! I'm being repressed!!! Dave K (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) About 10 weeks in Australia. Not sure how long it is in Germany. Tim (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) The admins have terms???? How long do they last? Or are they like kings? If so, I certainly didn't vote for them. JOHN (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)  
 
  Re: I'm so sorry....
 
(...) it is, I hope it won.) I haven't gone back through all the threads to check. Hey, here may be an idea...Who can write the worst opening line for a story, and manage to use Lego bricks as a part of it? For example: "Harry and Darlene were (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 
  blah!
 
blah blah! blah! (20 years ago, 13-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: Hoping I don't have to do the whole setup thing again
 
On 2007-02-07 22:08:07 -0500, "Jim DeVona" <jim.devona@gmail.com> said: (...) Experimenting with a Usenet client. How will it work? (20 years ago, 10-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR