 | | Re: Coolest Brickshelf account
|
|
(...) He was proven wealthy. ;) Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mocking (was: Coolest Brickshelf account)
|
|
(...) I would be surprised if there are not - it takes all kinds. (...) Depends on the beholder, so my denial or otherwise is irrelevant. (...) Certainly. (...) I don't recall doing so, but if I have, I'm sure you'll point me to it. Have you? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | testing1234
|
|
test (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Intuitively I sensed that numbers-is-numbers, but I couldn't logic it out enough to settle my brain on the matter. Thanks for the clarification! Dave! (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
(...) Statistically, assuming it's a fair draw, there should be no difference, as this is a draw with replacement (each time you start drawing 6 numbers, all 40 are there) at the start of the draw, between any 6 numbers. Non statistically, that is, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Preposterously simple stat question
|
|
Assume a weekly lottery that draws six numbers from the series 1 through 40, with no duplicates. Statistically speaking, am I better off repeatedly playing the same six numbers selecting six numbers at random each week? It seems to me that if (in a (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of MB 3660: Dread Eye's Phantom
|
|
(...) Wow! I've been toying with the Dread Eye's Phantom as well and was extremely impressed. This review is extremely detailed and 100% accurate. It is a little unrealistic that the entire ship is said to be carved from the skeleton of a whale. (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Dread Eye's Phantom
|
|
Hi all! I've been awaiting a lego pirate ship that is up par...u pirate people know what i mean. I have Captain Redbeard's pirate ship, which i thought was decent. The ship is lacking in authenticity and is quite simple to piece together. However, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Is this the new europe? or the old?
|
|
(URL) .5M people, which is a lot, relatively speaking. (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Review of MB 3660: Dread Eye's Phantom
|
|
Review of Dread Eye’s Phantom MSRP: $49.99 Before I begin, we need to get a few things out of the way: One: The Figures: These are the sculpted and highly detailed figures I discussed in an earlier review, and if you simply don’t like them, you (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of MB 9848: Argentum Silver Armor Dragon
|
|
Addendum—boy, am I a knucklehead. The Dragon does have a cluster of four studs at the middle of its back, exactly positioned for a minifig to sit upon it. While penning my dazzlingly eloquent review, I had the wings swept back in such a way that the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Review of MB 9848: Argentum Silver Armor Dragon
|
|
This is from the Dragons: Metal Ages series, continuing the line of “Dragon Eggs” that we’ve seen before (but now better, IMO). In brief, each set is a large egg containing a single dragon figurine in ten pieces. I haven’t previously been thrilled (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Megabloks acquires Rose Art
|
|
(...) I know almost nothing about Rose Art, except for what I've seen of the Magnetix toys on stores' shelves. However, as I read the PowerPoint presentation on the MEGABLOKS website, I noticed something interesting in the discussion of license (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a scary one
|
|
(...) That's legitimate, IMO. Heck, if the sentence included some kind of "you may not withhold this information from prospective employers," then there's no problem with due process, either. It's analogous to the financial industry, many portions (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a scary one
|
|
(...) Agree with the above, and further I don't support name-and-shame as a punishment mechanism unless it's imposed at the time of sentencing, but I do support the notion of being able to inquire "is this potential employee already convicted of (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a scary one
|
|
(...) This is a tough conversation to have because, to some people, even suggesting that child molesters might not actually be the devil incarnate is tantamount to molesting children yourself. I've been in online forums with a decidedly left-leaning (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a scary one
|
|
In the UK, we do not name-and-shame as it is recognised that it can force individuals underground instead of bringing them back into society. Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a scary one
|
|
(...) I'm down with publishing convictions but accusations? Not so much. As it turns out maybe I'm biased, we had a recent situation where having the convictions published was a good thing as it got someone outed that really didn't need to be around (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Here's a scary one
|
|
In this article: (URL) is proposed that the government keep and publish a list of all accusations of child molestation. While the intent to make it easier to discover molesters is good, it has serious consequences for someone wrongly accused. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts?
|
|
(...) Update - I don't know why this piqued my interest, but it did. Anyway, Googling for PIC16F876 and CD4066BCM brought up a couple of interesting pages. Some of the images came from (URL) this page> on DansData web site. There's also a (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
