Subject:
|
Re: Here's a scary one
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:11:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2053 times
|
| |
|
|
In the UK, we do not name-and-shame as it is recognised that it can force
individuals underground instead of bringing them back into society.
Scott A
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz wrote:
> > In this article:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/16/hamilton.child.support/index.html
> >
> > it is proposed that the government keep and publish a list of all
> > accusations of child molestation. While the intent to make it easier to
> > discover molesters is good, it has serious consequences for someone wrongly
> > accused. Already, it is kind of scary (as someone who volunteers with youth)
> > how easily one's life can be destroyed by a kid deciding to "get even" with
> > someone by making an accusation. To make these false accusations easily
> > searchable would probably make it impossible to recover from such an
> > accusation.
>
> I'm down with publishing convictions but accusations? Not so much.
>
> As it turns out maybe I'm biased, we had a recent situation where having the
> convictions published was a good thing as it got someone outed that really
> didn't need to be around kids nearly as much as he or she was. Sorry, no more
> detail than that please.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Here's a scary one
|
| (...) I'm down with publishing convictions but accusations? Not so much. As it turns out maybe I'm biased, we had a recent situation where having the convictions published was a good thing as it got someone outed that really didn't need to be around (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
