 | | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Okaay. Thanks for that. (...) I never mentioned "politics"; in fact, I specifically mentioned culture. (...) That would be another discussion, and knock yourself out, but one word of warning-- "Protestantism" is NOT a "religion". (...) What is (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Suicide for the Democratic Party
|
|
As they say, it's always those who are the loudest that get heard, or is it that shoot their mouths off first? (URL) -Avery (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Maybe we should all convert to Islam. Then that sort of thing would never be allowed. But seriously, what exactly are you frightened of? Nothing in there is suggesting that you give up your idea of what a man is. If you are feeling threatened (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Always nice to be informed on what the malnutritioned MALE will be wearing this fall, tho! On another level, this whole discussion does say a lot about the political climate/freedoms we do enjoy, regardless what side of the fence you sit on, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Matters on what you define as "manliness." Some forms of masculinity are rebuffed by the Left - such as not allowing women into the army (the manly-man should never have to rely on women to fight wars). You could say that the Politically (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) In general. Both the conventional Right and conventional Left (in the US anyway) want to restrict choices... I think you're right, the right may be a bit more nervous about gender bending but that's small potatoes really. The quote I cited to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) With respect to a cultural shift towards unmanliness, or in general? I mean, I haven't actually seen evidence that the Left cares one way or another in regards to the decline of masculinity, but I have seen a tendancy on the Right of general (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Guys, guys. I think John is just sickened by that terrible outfit: (URL) model for Davidelfin> This is purely a "he's wearing what?" situation not a "he's afirming his choice to what?" situation. ~Kevoh tongue -> cheek (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Would that one of the Right or Left actually DID want to allow people choice. Neither conventional end of the conventional spectrum acts like it does want that. (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
(URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) There's a lot of babble, gafla, marketspeak, posery etc, in there but is this the part you want to go to war with?? (...) If so color me scared. THAT's actually a valid notion. (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) So, what's that got to do with the Left per se? I mean, as far as I can tell, the only difference is that the Left would want to allow such a shift, whereas the Right would want to disallow it. I don't think the Left is actually *encouraging* (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(...) Yeah ok whatever. That is bad fashion yaya-crappola. And I really doubt this stuff has any political value to it whatever, so I seriously dislike you categorizing the 'Left' as supporting this stuff. I could point to extreme far rightists who (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | another image test
|
|
(URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Falling thru earth revisited
|
|
(...) Sounds right to me. Acceleration adds linearly, so when you integrate to get the velocity, you have the integral of the thrust plus the integral of the gravitational acceleration. Assuming that the change in mass of the rocket due to depleted (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | image test
|
|
(URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | I think I'm going to puke....
|
|
(URL) is why I fear the Left. This is cultural war. JOHN (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Falling thru earth revisited
|
|
(...) One other thing to think about is the amount of time something's been exposed to something that increases its speed. For example: Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima have a race from point A to point B, and back to point A. Aunt Jemima stays at a (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Falling thru earth revisited
|
|
'cause I've been ruminating about it.... So let's take this from the base model-- Base model ignores the following-- Rotation AIr Resistance you have the earth and a hole from where you are, going straight thru the center and right out to the other (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: post 11112?
|
|
(...) Yummi, Jeroen (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
