 | | Re: Comparative freedom
|
|
(...) David (no "!") understood what I was refering to - technically everything Canada did was supposed to be approved by the Queen until that last vestige of empire was officially expunged a couple of decades ago. I was embarrassed for my Canadian (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Buses & Beggers [Re: Vote against/for...]
|
|
(...) In what way are they *SPECIFICALLY* linked. -John (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Test #2
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)
|
| |
| | Test #2
|
|
I hate Computers (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
Just a test! (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| |
| | Re: Comparative freedom
|
|
(...) If it was Québec, I am not a bit surprised. The Crown had assumed compromises to protect the french heritage of the province. Obviously, they would rather keep the privilege. (...) Was that clause used often, btw? (...) The Crown declared war. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another math problem
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Per Dave's last message, y is unknown (can't be 0), which Jeff has solved to 855/11. -Rob. (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another math problem
|
|
(...) Hey, that's super! And I finally found an online reference at the U of Georgia site, so I can probably handle these in the future. Thanks for the clear explanation and the solution. Dave! (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Comparative freedom
|
|
(...) Someone once said that America needed a revolution to become their own country--Canada just 'evolved' into our own, and not without a few snags ourself. PET (Pierre Trudeau) 'decides' to get our constitution over here from Britain--got 9 (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another math problem
|
|
(...) Oops. Hang on there Adrian, read for content. The five points as given in the initial problem (including 0,0) will not solve to a simple parabolic equation. Eliminating 0,0 does give us the solution specified above. Bleh. Adrian (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
