Subject:
|
Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Oct 1999 09:45:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
387 times
|
| |
|
|
In both cases I think ignorance is the problem, rather than deceitfulness.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
|
| I haven't corresponded with the second seller but the first one, based on his note, really did believe he had the box, turned his place upside down for it, and failed to find it, finding only the destroyed remains. See his listing, which has been (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
|
| I got a note from the first seller, he THOUGHT he had the box and told me he was going to modify the listing to clarify. I think he's jake. The second seller I did not send mail to so cannot comment on. While we can have good fun here we do need to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
