Theory : 428


Marketplace / Theory / 428	427 \| 429

Subject:	Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
Newsgroups:	lugnet.market.theory
Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 1999 22:23:28 GMT
Reply-To:	lpieniazek@NOSPAMnovera.com
Viewed:	319 times

And continuing along that vein, here's an interesting interpretation of "mint in box" http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=183974073&tc=photo1186 Mint apparently means 2 or 3 pieces missing! Quoting: " MISSING 2 OR 3 SMALL PIECES BUT WHEN PUT TOGETHER YOU CANNOT TELL THEY ARE " Ah, but the TruFAN would know. -- Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet. NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
(...) Hm, I wonder if it's worth raising a stink with eBay. Both of these are clearly misrepresentations. New in Box should not have a picture of a set in a plastic baggie and no sign of the box. Mint should clearly not be a set which is missing (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)

Message is in Reply To:

		Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
Check out: (URL) an interesting interpretation of "new in box". (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search