 | | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) (I've added a few '' pairs to any words that I condider subjective!) I don't think that it is wrong as such, but for me it goes against the principle of feedback. Ie. feedback is 'worth' a lot more if the person is so truely impressed with (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) That's not how eBay feedback is seen or used. It is almost completely _quantity_-based. You'll see people say, "I don't think someone with such a low number feedback should be making comments like that." Even if the person has 5 purely (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) Fair enough, I tried not to pass any judgement as I do believe that what Larry is asking about is neither 'right' or 'wrong'. The only real point that I was trying to make is that doing something just because everyone else does it isn't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) Agreed. Unfortunately, the latter is the norm on eBay. (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) I agree. And I'd never leave positive feedback for someone I had serious issues with just because they left positive feedback for me. However, given the way eBay works, I have been putting a statement to the effect of "I welcome feedback and (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) I don't think you have to spend an hour reading someones feedback. When evaluating a seller, I look for a reasonable positive rating (the larger the transaction, the higher I look for). I do go in and look at the comments. What I do is look at (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
|
(...) Hah. I went over the edge *looooooonnngg ago*. Ciao! (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
