 | | The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | My deepest apologies for this long re-post, but I had meant to change the name of this thread, as the current name was completely off-topic, but I posted just the same. Please make replies to this current subject to this version of the post. Thank (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Care and Feeding of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Paul Klenk
|
| | | | | (...) Matt, Thanks for doing that. I was pretty astonished that, as a newbie, I could actually post a topic that not only spawned 83 posts but also started a minor war on LUGNET! Flattered as I was by that, I thank you for being mindful of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Perhaps you need to think about your tone, this almost sounds like a threat? I really think you are confusing the message with the messenger. Go back and read Brian's post. Consider it fully. Was he wrong? Was I wrong to support him? Scott A (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) If you're referring to: (URL) I think you are, all you are doing here is trying to publicly further your personal vendetta against Larry. Matt is totally right. And it is about the messenger, YOU have beaten this issue to a pulp. Take your (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) This is what I don't get. Larry offends people. Larry acts childishly. Larry engages in name-calling. But when I point all this out, I get the flack. (...) I shall ask again: was Brian wrong? It's a simple question. (...) I'm glad we agree on (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Rich Manzo
|
| | | | | | | I haven't followed this dabate for a long time nor do I care to at this point. However please keep it out of the market forum; it doesnt belong here. -Rich (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | XFUT'ed to .off-topic.debate and .people at Rich Mazno's request. Only keeping it in market for this one post, for continuity so people using newsreaders know my reply is moving. :-) (...) Is my assessment of the above post correct or incorrect? It (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Vendettas (was Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'd argue that this is an admin issue if it belongs anywhere on LUGNET(tm) at all. (which I doubt, at this point, that it does) It's a stretch to see how this fits the lugnet.people charter: lugnet.people– All about LEGO® people (enthusiasts, (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Why keep reducing this to personalities? This is about issues - not personalities. Stick to the issues. Forget your relationship with Larry for now. I shall ask again: This is what I don't get. Larry offends people. Larry acts childishly. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...) —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | [OK...I'm going to keep my cool here, and not attack Scott, despite my sensabilities crying out for lots of sarcasm, exclamation points and capital letters. I'm just going to point out a couple of facts and leave it at that. I suggest that anyone (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Community Involvement And Personal Issues (Was: The Care and Feeding...) —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | (...) Creative snipping to make a false point Scott? Bad form, old boy. Let's go ahead and restore the part where I explain what you are intentionally misconstruing as a threat, so it's true meaning is once again made clear: (...) So let's recap, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Community Involvement And Personal Issues (Was: The Care and Feeding...) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Forgive me Matthew if I have misunderstood your tone - I apologise for that. I would just like to clarify one very small point: (...) You are talking about this message of mine: (URL) up thread, and you will see that: 1) Larry had already made a (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
