Subject:
|
Re: "Default" part type.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Mar 2001 06:56:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
611 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Peter White writes:
> In lugnet.market.theory, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Do other people find this state of affairs confusing? Maybe this really is
> > just a Brickbay suggestion (and I'll go make it there) but I am wondering if
> > there's a larger issue here or not.
>
> Sellers should mention the condition, maybe abbreviations would help.
> eg. N(new),U1(used-excellent),U2(used-good),U3(used-fair),U4(used-poor).
> Or you could 'out' the sellers.
I don't think any kind of "rating system" is a good idea. There would just
be too many problems with that. Some people would be confident that their
item is in "N (new)" condition while others would think the same item fits
into "U1 (used-excellent)" condition.
A good example of this is the MIB/MISB issue. Some extremist think that MIB
is unopened while other times I received sets that had broken / missing /
slightly discolored pieces that were classified as MIB. Even new pieces
would be hard to classify.
It has been discussed before, even before BB started and a lot of people
were against it. That's why BB doesn't have a rating system. Interestingly
I have yet to receive a complaint that a buyer is unsatisfied with his or
her purchase because the item wasn't as described.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "Default" part type.
|
| (...) That's because BB has a better class of buyer and a better class of seller than the mechanisms that come before it, and because most of use realise that for the most part, we can bug you for new features, but mostly need to work our (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "Default" part type.
|
| (...) It's usually clearer on ebay, it's a selling point. Maybe it's why the parts are cheaper. (...) Design compromise: Can you alter colors to suit new parts availability. (...) Could be some sellers are milking the situation. Maybe assume used (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
