To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.theoryOpen lugnet.market.theory in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Theory / 1183
  Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
 
(...) I already have pieniazek.org and another domain the name of which will be revealed later. What would I need with legoland.cc? No way would I be able to hold on to it, or if I could, Lego would surely not pay .5M for it. This person is a fool. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
 
Larry, (...) You too, huh? I have one already, which I will reveal hopefully in a couple of weeks. (It is a big project I have been working on since November, my schedule has been so screwed up lately, but after I get married in May, I will be able (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
 
(...) At the risk of getting torched, I would like to inject a few thoughts here. Disclaimer: I know nothing of law, internet law, trademark law, not even traffic laws. I even have been known to have limited thought processes. First, the four letter (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
 
(...) Some of what you say is true but I'd advocate that you, or others interested in this topic, dig a little... in .publish I believe it was someone posted an absolutely excellent pointer to a trademark case involving Clue Consulting and Hasbro. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???
 
(...) in (...) well written. (...) Hey, excellent pointer. Wow--all that legal stuff. I just read 99% of it and I have to agree with the decision. One statement made by the court judge that I particularly agree with is this: "If another Internet (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???)
 
Kevin, (...) infringement, because the sellers intent was to use the LEGO brand name to motivate someone to buy it. "Make Millions off of LEGO," and all that. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???)
 
Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <38D83277.B6E578E0@c...eb.net>... (...) it and (...) that (...) judge (...) Without a doubt, that is the seller's obvious intent. What can TLC legally do about intent?? I do not know, but my guess in this situation (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR