 | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | (...) "legoland.cc"? Since when was Legoland a community college? (I know, I know, that's .cc.us .) Hopefully TLG's lawyers are already on the ball with this one. best LFB (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | Lindsay, (...) I can't believe no one bid on this yet. Come on Larry, it's only 500,000.00 to start! ;) Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Aaron West
|
| | | | | (...) know, that's .cc.us (...) I tried to bid on it, but they want credit verification for amounts over $5000, and that puts me over my limit of $500,004. Shesh, a lousy $5 bucks to verify my value! Don't they know what my LEGO collection is (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Matthew Wilkins
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.market.theory, Aaron West writes: <schnip!> (...) You have cheese? *smile* (...) -Cheese the_cheese@hotmail.com (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I already have pieniazek.org and another domain the name of which will be revealed later. What would I need with legoland.cc? No way would I be able to hold on to it, or if I could, Lego would surely not pay .5M for it. This person is a fool. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | Larry, (...) You too, huh? I have one already, which I will reveal hopefully in a couple of weeks. (It is a big project I have been working on since November, my schedule has been so screwed up lately, but after I get married in May, I will be able (...) (25 years ago, 21-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | (...) At the risk of getting torched, I would like to inject a few thoughts here. Disclaimer: I know nothing of law, internet law, trademark law, not even traffic laws. I even have been known to have limited thought processes. First, the four letter (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Some of what you say is true but I'd advocate that you, or others interested in this topic, dig a little... in .publish I believe it was someone posted an absolutely excellent pointer to a trademark case involving Clue Consulting and Hasbro. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ??? —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | (...) in (...) well written. (...) Hey, excellent pointer. Wow--all that legal stuff. I just read 99% of it and I have to agree with the decision. One statement made by the court judge that I particularly agree with is this: "If another Internet (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | Kevin, (...) infringement, because the sellers intent was to use the LEGO brand name to motivate someone to buy it. "Make Millions off of LEGO," and all that. Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGOLAND.CC Auction WAS: (Re: The Nugator Company for Sale ???) —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message <38D83277.B6E578E0@c...eb.net>... (...) it and (...) that (...) judge (...) Without a doubt, that is the seller's obvious intent. What can TLC legally do about intent?? I do not know, but my guess in this situation (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
