Subject:
|
Re: Equivalency Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 23:18:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
643 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.jambalaya, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm thinking about replacing the stuff I take whenever the option comes
> to me and I'm interested in thoughts from y'all. I am taking it for
> granted that I will replace with more/better (by a little) than what I
> take, but some things are hard to judge.
>
> An easy hypothetical: I take out five blue 2x4s and replace it with the
> Fabuland taxi garage. I've replaced five common elements with one
> wildly uncommon one. Is that fair?
> What if those 2x4s were silver? Does it matter that I decreased the
> _number_ of elements?
>
> Is it the number, the 'value', or the bulk what we're trying to grow?
>
> If I wanted to put in this Fabuland taxi garage, how much could I take
> out in exchange?
>
> To some extent, each box can have different rules, but I'm betting there
> will be some predominantly common rules too. Is this one?
>
> On another note, ten people have posted to lmj thusfar. Are there a
> bunch of others of you out there who will want to play too, but just
> haven't posted?
I have to admit since I'm stingy about my collection, I want to see how it
goes with this great experiment first. Unless I have scads of something, which
I don't, I usually find it difficult to trade. So ATM I'm a lurker here.
-Tom McD.
when replying, the Streets of San Franspamcake - a Quinn Martin production.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Equivalency Question
|
| Hi all, I'm thinking about replacing the stuff I take whenever the option comes to me and I'm interested in thoughts from y'all. I am taking it for granted that I will replace with more/better (by a little) than what I take, but some things are hard (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
