 | | Re: Lego funny money —Ben Ridout
|
| | | (...) I appreciate your levelheadedness and concern. Thank you. I think posting 1 teeny tiny message about how I and others can get money to buy LEGO is related to, albeit indirectly. I considered this before posting. However, in hindsight it still (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego funny money —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) If it's posted via a newsreader, there will (should) be, somewhere in your software, a mechanism for canceling posts. If it's posted via the web interface, the only extant mechanism is to e-mail Todd with the message number (in this case, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Ben Ridout
|
| | | | | | I post from the web, but I made the effort to figure it out through the newsreader route. Thanks. -Ben Ridout =P (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, I thought it would be OK if Ben posted it too. (After seeing Larry's message yesterday about X.com, Ben asked me what I thought about his posting a message about alladvantage.com.) I told Ben I thought it was fine (didn't break any LUGNET (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Boy, looking at their TOS, how do they expect people to find people to refer, though perhaps Ben's post is not SPAM by their definition since he acquired Todd's permission to post before hand (and assuming Ben's note to Todd didn't attempt to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | | | | (...) I've got to say that I appreciate it, though. I got spammed by some stranger about it, reported it, and got a very quick and courteous response from the folks there. I see enough advertising every day, I don't really want to get ads (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Sort of like a third-party services group? (lugnet.market.services?) In your mind (or anyone following along), which of the following would such a group cover? - factoring? - insurance? - escrow? - banking? - (other?) --Todd (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, in some ways I could even see that as a separate group, but I guess if we had a lugnet.market.services, then all of the above would be appropriate, and those making offers for using them as their refferal would make such offers here (if (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Ya, MTE (my thoughts exactly)! :) --Todd (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Yup. I only brought it up because Alladvantage is very hard-line on keeping it's subscribers from spamming. James (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that's because as probably the best-known "paid to surf" program, they catch all the flack from losers spamming hundreds of groups at a time with info about it. I've seen AA go from something I doubted would survive to what seems to be (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego funny money —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) I use (and actively promote via my website at www.mikesdeals.com) All Advantage and I love it. But yeah, posting things to newsgroups is specifically forbidden. AA just sent out a reminder of its anti-spam policy yesterday. I've been thrilled (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
