Subject:
|
Re: Lego funny money
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 19:27:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@ANTISPAMnewsguy.com
|
Viewed:
|
630 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:10:08 GMT, "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com>
wrote:
> I thought it would be OK because it seemed "reasonably related to" LEGO toys.
> (After all, it's how Ben is currently funding his LEGO addition.) I don't
> subscribe to the service and wasn't aware of its non-spam policy. If what
> Ben posted is considered spam by alladvantage.com's TOS, then even though it
> doesn't (IMHO) break any LUGNET rules (so far as I can tell), it still could
> be (as James pointed out) a problem for Ben...
I use (and actively promote via my website at www.mikesdeals.com) All
Advantage and I love it. But yeah, posting things to newsgroups is
specifically forbidden. AA just sent out a reminder of its anti-spam
policy yesterday.
I've been thrilled with AA so far, and while I am not using the money
I get from it to fund my LEGO addiction, part of the money I make each
month is going to pay for my webhosting account, which houses my
LEGO-related domain.
I didn't have much faith in any of these "get paid to surf" programs
when they started, and I still think most of them will flop, but AA's
made some decisions and implementations recently that make me think
that they will be one of the ones to survive.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego funny money
|
| (...) Hmm, I thought it would be OK if Ben posted it too. (After seeing Larry's message yesterday about X.com, Ben asked me what I thought about his posting a message about alladvantage.com.) I told Ben I thought it was fine (didn't break any LUGNET (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
