Subject:
|
Re: 6037 Witch's Windship
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.auction
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:55:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.COMnomorespam
|
Viewed:
|
464 times
|
| |
|
|
The Doctor What wrote:
> Wasn't aware it was an issue or a problem.
> Assumed it was like putting a
> link in for the set search. Won't do it again.
No huhu... see the thread that starts *here*
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=1740
to see why Todd and many others feel it's not considered cricket.
The distinction revolves around automatic bandwidth consumption vs.
requested (chasing a link is a requested one, seeing an image is a
mandatory consumption)
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 6037 Witch's Windship
|
| (...) Wasn't aware it was an issue or a problem. Assumed it was like putting a link in for the set search. Won't do it again. Regarding the quote (Yeah, I'm a know-it-all), Leopold Kronecker (1823-1891): (URL) don't agree with the quote, either. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
