 | | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) Well, with all of that in mind and because it is an obviously good point, I added a "Notes" section to my sample item description and a special note following the section on the relationship between tobacco smoke defects and resale value. I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Small annoyance with seller
|
|
Hey Y'all: I had a recent hassle with a seller on Brickbay who sold me a yellow castle minifigure and some other bits that were not in the "Great Condition" described. I found the black visor on the minifigure to have been chewed (ABC) and other (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) c /effect/affect/ or c /How does it effect/What effect does it have on/ GRIN But anyway, great question. I think it should have a strong negative effect, or that is, it should affect the score negatively. GRIN again. I don't know if it should (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
What about cigarette smoke? How does it effect the score? - David (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) A great effort Richard, but I'm still no clearer on the difference between MISB! and MISB!!!!? :) A general point, I think the scoring from 1-100 is a little ambitious. What is the deference between a 56 box and a 57? I think 0-10 would be (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
Hey Y'all: I have created a printer friendly, html version of my proposed construction toy grading standards and it is now live online at: (URL) hope that it will prove useful in providing an easier method of appraising and communicating the (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.appraisal, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
This is very useful and I wish it was around a fews months ago when I had problems with a buyer. So with all this being said, if a seal looks like it might have been moved or opened, where would this fit in the categories? A 98 perhaps? Thanks for (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
(...) I think these are an excellent piece of work. Where I think more verbiage might be helpful is in a discussion of what exactly "sealed" means. Sets are sealed in many different ways depending on the technology. One of the more common ways is (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Need value of RED 12V train motor
|
|
Hi, I would like to get estimate how much I could get for a RED 12 volt train motor in USED condition, which has one wheel loose (i suppose glue would fix that), and the small clips on other end of motor broken off. The engine runs fine and is (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Construction Toy Grading Standards
|
|
Looks good to me! --Gary jedi*mugin alaskanjedi to many aliases to list in this sig.... richard marchetti <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GLqJo3.IyD@lugnet.com... (...) annoys. (...) it (...) to (...) bit (...) the (...) new (...) only (...) (23 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
|
