| |
In lugnet.loc.us.mi, Tony Hedglen writes:
> This is where I think a small city would come in handy. My opinion a big
> downtown would not look good in a small display. Don’t get me wrong, the
> skyscrapers are very impressive. The monorail is really cool to have going
> though a city, but I think smaller displays need smaller cities. I’m
> thinking of something like Ann Arbor. It would have a nice sized train yard
> but the downtown would be smaller with smaller buildings. I do think we need
> more train related stuff for just an occasion. We could focus more on train
> stuff with a smaller display. I also agree with Scott on the "Lego"
> buldings. Costum buildins would be more impressive. In my own opinion of
> course. I would like to hear what people think the smaller display would
> look like.
One thing I think we need to do is work on crowding. At the January GATS,
each building had a huge open area around it. If skyscrapers are included,
they need to be crammed together. This has two advantages: More realistic,
and takes less space. Even lowrise and single story could benefit from
crowding. About the only area that I thought was crowded enough was the
subdivision. But of course at that show there was a lot of area to fill.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
