Subject:
|
Re: International Society of Meccanomen
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:58:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
61 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
> In lugnet.general, Steve Lane writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
> >
> > > *Visually* superior perhaps, but only because LEGO is more of a sculpting
> > > medium. Meccano has a definite mechanical advantage due to the strength and
> > > precision it derives from being made of steel, brass, etc.
> > >
> > > Allan B.
> >
> > Meccano hasn't got pneumatics though has it. So I'd say Lego has the
> > pneumatic advantage.
> >
> > Steve
>
> An excellent point. That one had slipped my mind. I guess I was thinking
> more along the lines of the hardened brass gears and incredibly strong
> beams, axles and brackets; perhaps things more appropriate for gear boxes,
> cranes, bridges etc. Of course these things can all be built from LEGO, but
> in Meccano they can be built bigger, longer and especially... stronger.
I'd be interested to see a Maccano crane bigger than Dennis Bosman's:
http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/highway/2290/cmno04.html
Though, as you say, it could probably be built stronger out of Meccano. The
biggest hassle I had with Meccano was losing all those pesky little nuts &
bolts...
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: International Society of Meccanomen
|
| (...) An excellent point. That one had slipped my mind. I guess I was thinking more along the lines of the hardened brass gears and incredibly strong beams, axles and brackets; perhaps things more appropriate for gear boxes, cranes, bridges etc. Of (...) (23 years ago, 22-Aug-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
