Subject:
|
New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:09:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
892 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
You're about as representative as anybody else, as there's no
organisation, so go for it.
Of course, I retain the right to stone you to death with BURPs if I
don't like what you say :-)
'course, if we've got an official representative, we might have to get
an official organisation...
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Simon Bennett (<GH2yA2.D4I@lugnet.com>) wrote at
12:20:26
>
> Second is that they want me as a representative of UKLUG. May I do this?
> Does anyone who posts to loc.uk object and if so should I not do it? I know
> there is no official structure and this may suggest to others that there is,
> would that be a problem?
>
> Any help gladly recieved.
>
> Psi
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate
|
| (...) Thanks Tony (...) LOL! What a way to go! I'll tread carefully :) (...) Well, I'm by no means saying I'm going to officially represent us on a regular basis :) I'm not a good enough builder and despite working in Railways I don't own any train (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread: ![New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Simon Bennett (26-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Simon Bennett (26-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Ronan Webb (28-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Thomas (T. J.) Avery (26-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -James Stacey (27-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -James Stacey (30-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -James Stacey (31-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -James Stacey (31-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Larry Pieniazek (17-Apr-02 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -James Stacey (17-Apr-02 to lugnet.loc.uk)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Jason J. Railton (27-Jul-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Simon Bennett (3-Aug-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Civil Engineer - Lego vs Meccano debate -Thomas (T. J.) Avery (3-Aug-01 to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|