Subject:
|
Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:53:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
397 times
|
| |
|
|
I second this idea! and I'll put up 200g of new parts any other takers!!!!!
Jason
----- Original Message -----
From: Huw Millington <hmillington@cix.co.uk>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
>
> "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@briscoej.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:GCM36A.KxB@lugnet.com...
>
> > Therefore I vote to continue, maybe with uniform agreement? I quite like
> > Huw's idea of a new parts only box? Hands up if you in for that one? in
> > addition perhaps a weight limit needs to be applied as clearly the box • has
> > mushroomed and quality plumeted?
>
> How about a combination of ideas: a 1Kg J-box with only new parts to be
> added to it. Many of us are picky and only 'do' new parts :-)
>
> Huw
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| (...) So, what you're saying is, you don't want the current one(s?). Can I break it up like I suggested then? You can start another one if you like; that's just two conditions then, so Jason'll be happy :-) Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@brisc...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GCM36A.KxB@lugnet.com... (...) How about a combination of ideas: a 1Kg J-box with only new parts to be added to it. Many of us are picky and only 'do' new parts :-) Huw (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
