Subject:
|
Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 May 2001 11:45:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
717 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Jason Briscoe writes:
> From: Huw Millington <hmillington@cix.co.uk>
> > "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@briscoej.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:GCM36A.KxB@lugnet.com...
> > > Therefore I vote to continue, maybe with uniform agreement? I quite like
> > > Huw's idea of a new parts only box? Hands up if you in for that one? in
> > > addition perhaps a weight limit needs to be applied as clearly the box
> > > has mushroomed and quality plumeted?
> >
> > How about a combination of ideas: a 1Kg J-box with only new parts to be
> > added to it. Many of us are picky and only 'do' new parts :-)
> > Huw
> I second this idea! and I'll put up 200g of new parts any other takers!!!!!
> Jason
So, what you're saying is, you don't want the current one(s?). Can I break
it up like I suggested then? You can start another one if you like; that's
just two conditions then, so Jason'll be happy :-)
Jason J Railton
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| I second this idea! and I'll put up 200g of new parts any other takers!!!!! Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: Huw Millington <hmillington@cix.co.uk> To: <> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What) (...) has (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
