Subject:
|
Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:10:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
382 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@briscoej.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GCM36A.KxB@lugnet.com...
> Therefore I vote to continue, maybe with uniform agreement? I quite like
> Huw's idea of a new parts only box? Hands up if you in for that one? in
> addition perhaps a weight limit needs to be applied as clearly the box has
> mushroomed and quality plumeted?
How about a combination of ideas: a 1Kg J-box with only new parts to be
added to it. Many of us are picky and only 'do' new parts :-)
Huw
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| I second this idea! and I'll put up 200g of new parts any other takers!!!!! Jason ----- Original Message ----- From: Huw Millington <hmillington@cix.co.uk> To: <> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:10 PM Subject: Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What) (...) has (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| (...) RE: J-Boxes (...) Seems like three conditions? but anyway I'm sure we get the idea. (...) Well when the first box started over a year ago, it was pretty good, and I'm sure I'm not theonly one that got something useful out of the box. Therefore (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
