Subject:
|
Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:46:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
532 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@briscoej.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GCM36A.KxB@lugnet.com...
>
> Therefore I vote to continue, maybe with uniform agreement? I quite like
> Huw's idea of a new parts only box? Hands up if you in for that one? in
> addition perhaps a weight limit needs to be applied as clearly the box has
> mushroomed and quality plumeted?
>
> Other ideas folks?
I thought Steve Burge's idea (expressed at the fest) of a constant weight
j-box was a good idea.
i.e. the box always weighs one kilo - if you take something out, then you
have to replace it with the same weight (lead shot not permitted)
this way you know that it is always being replenished (though possibly with
junk), and everyone also knows precisely in advance what the postage is
going to involve.
regards
lawrence
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| (...) with (...) We could always split it into several smaller themed J-boxes, i.e. a minifig J-box, a technic J-box, a System J-box and a literature J-box. Steve (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: UK J-Boxes (was: So What)
|
| (...) RE: J-Boxes (...) Seems like three conditions? but anyway I'm sure we get the idea. (...) Well when the first box started over a year ago, it was pretty good, and I'm sure I'm not theonly one that got something useful out of the box. Therefore (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
