 | | etoys - bad news.
|
|
Good News I got my shipping confirmation today for an order I placed on 02.01.01 Bad News Two of the items (Power Pullers) have been put on “Backorder” “Unfortunately, when your order was processed, we discovered that some items where not available (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G779KB.BLn@lugnet.com... (...) items (...) further (...) Seeing as they shut up shop at the end of the month, and they were only discounting to clear their inventory, I cant see them actually (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) I received confirmation that my (presumably whole) order was despatched on 10/1/01, but it has yet to arrive... (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) I still have none of my 4... but all are in the mail. 'Tracking' tells me one is waiting for collection in Maidstone and the others were delived to Glanrothes, Famac(?) and Reading last year. Scott A (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Don't trust the tracking. It's completely useless. The handling numbers are re-used, so you're seeing the previous packages with those numbers. The one awaiting collection might be genuine (if the date is good), but you'll probably get it (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) All arrived yesterday. When I got home last night my wife was stomping around the house like the T-Rex out of Jurassic Park. Attempts to pacify by claiming the packages were “mostly air” DID_NOT_WORK. By around 9pm, were able to have an (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G7F2rM.E74@lugnet.com... (...) by (...) You didnt write 'must support my lego collecting' into the pre-nuptual agreement then? Try getting her to adopt a hobby that involves collecting things. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) ROFL.....both of us ! My wife just puts the packages on my desk in the study, no questions asked !!!!! Mind you, she does open the letters from e-bay sales and any cash is usually missing and cheques already banked before I get home. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
ROTFL! I love the analogy. Sudden stop to the laughing now, as I recall that none of my etoys acquisitions have been transferred to home from work yet. My wife tore open this month's credit card statement, as usual, before I could get to it. The (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Although thay were authorised the day I ordered, 3 out 4 of my charges did not appear until today… I was hoping they’d overlooked me! My bill was issed yesterday - so 3 out 4 of my transactions will have to wait until next month's bill! Scott (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) At least you have Valentine's Day beforehand to soften the blow. Mark (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) ballistic. As opposed to 56 days to pay! (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) by (...) I obviously didn't order enough - all I got was an eye-roll. I am kicking myself now for not jumping in quicker - I would like to have got a UCS X-wing and an RIS. (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
Valentine's day. Of course! I may be saved, although I'll probably have to match the cost of the Lego. It's going to have to be a £300+ diamond ring or necklace then. Mutters under breath... "I could have spent that on more Lego." JG Mark Morgan (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
"lawrence wilkes" <lawrence@thewilkesf...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:G7FAJ0.DCu@lugnet.com... (...) were (...) Damn, I never thought of that. I'm only engaged so I may still have time, but my fiancee appears to understand my LEGO needs (she (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
"Jonathon Goldsworthy" <jgold@cableinet.co.uk> wrote in message news:G7MsJB.42M@lugnet.com... (...) ballistic. (...) That should be long enough to build a PMT-proof nuclear bunker ;) Nicholas Allan (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Ooh, you're going straight to hell for that one! Watch out down there! Jason. (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
"Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:G7xB0F.K72@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) <sounds of screaming, followed by loud thud>My that was a long drop...Hmm, it's rather warm down here.... ;) Nicholas Allan (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Probably safer though. Hell hath no fury, etc... Jason. (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Not sure why exactly, but for some reason I have this image of your wife intoning "We are not amused" in her best Queen Vic... ++Lar (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: etoys - bad news.
|
|
(...) Would you not be like that Larry if you had to live with me? :-) Scott A (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
