Subject:
|
Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:37:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1448 times
|
| |
| |
Hi
Richard the word IANAL - What is it?
I have recived communcation regarding the display of catalogue's
--
Michael
Please reply on
medwards@ukonline.co.uk
Home of the UK Technic Club Magazine
Web site: www.technic-uk.co.uk
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/medwards
Soon to be updated, soon to be good
212 models and going up
Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:FpM7vx.F8t@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Michael Edwards writes:
> > It does Scott, then when Lego starting visit my site more and more, I had a
> > warning email from Denmark about the logo's and in a nice way they asked me
> > to remove the logo and they will be very happy, in which I did, and it will
> > apply to everything that I do that has the logo there.
>
> I understand your concern, but using a logo divorced from its corporate context
> - ie copying a logo and placing it on a site is very different from
> redisplaying corperate literature already in the public domain. But that said,
> IANAL! Have you recieved communication specifically regarding the display of
> catalogues?
>
>
> > In fact I was told by a few employee's of Lego, they do like my site, they
> > use it for reverences and in the case of the new customer centre in Slough
> > they are actually asking people to look at unofficial sites like mine and
> > Huw's for details, they are also using Brickshelf and Lugnet.
>
> Congrats :)
>
>
> > I am starting to think that Lego really needs our help as in Information and
> > archive of manuals and images, I do wish Lego think of us more? How about
> > putting a little leaflet inside every Lego box to get people to look at
> > sites like Lugnet, or Leaflets in Technic Box to my site : A dream come true
> > if it did.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> It would be nice, but there are probably lots of reasons why it wouldn't happen
> - moderation being one of them - lego.com is heavily moderated, LUGNET and
> other sites aren't.
>
> I suppose we could hope for a 'fan web-site' section, with appropriate
> disclaimers on lego.com?
>
> Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
| (...) I am not a lawyer - see the acronym faq thread :) (...) What was this? Assuming that you've followed their instruction - do you know why they've singled you out - LUGNET, Brickshelf, Brickset etc are all permitted to show the red logo? It (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
| (...) I understand your concern, but using a logo divorced from its corporate context - ie copying a logo and placing it on a site is very different from redisplaying corperate literature already in the public domain. But that said, IANAL! Have you (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|