Subject:
|
Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:33:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.uk, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Simon Denscombe writes:
> > In article <FpCuwC.L1v@lugnet.com>, hmillington@cix.co.uk says...
> > > But the scans are mutilated for some reason. Wait until someone else does • it
> > > before putting on brickshelf.
> >
> > All the red lego logos have turned blue but the rest of the pic is not
> > affected.
> >
> > Strange....
>
> Strange indeed! But I'm guessing that it is just paranoia resulting from
> Michaels run-in with LEGO lawyers late last year. Personally, I don't think he
> would have any reason to fear them - catalogue scans are at least permitted
> elsewhere - but I'm incredibly not qualified to offer such advice :)
>
> Richard
It says on his website it's his agreement with Lego to make the LEGO logos blue
blocks.
Alan
This message's random set is: 1786, www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=1786
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
| Alan Gerber <foofoogood@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FpJ2Jz.G9w@lugnet.com... (...) blue (...) Yes, but I would have thought that it applied only to 'standalone' logos and not those embedded in other images. Everyone else gets away with it... (...) (27 years ago, 7-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2000 UK catalogue - my comments
|
| (...) Strange indeed! But I'm guessing that it is just paranoia resulting from Michaels run-in with LEGO lawyers late last year. Personally, I don't think he would have any reason to fear them - catalogue scans are at least permitted elsewhere - but (...) (27 years ago, 6-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
