 | | Re: FOTY! (was: FOTY?)
|
|
(...) PORTUGAL (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: FOTY! (was: FOTY?)
|
|
I'm not up on my location codes - from where are we talking about? 11.50 US is a HECKOFA bargin! (...) 2470)... (...) about (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | FOTY! (was: FOTY?)
|
|
(...) AT LAST, A BARGAIN! :-P I had been expecting this moment for a loooong time... does anyone want to buy this from here, cost price + shipping? Not that I think demand is high, but it was the second set I bought in 3 years that was well worth (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: FOTY?
|
|
(...) Yep... I bought both of mine for about 3 times as much! (they retail for about $35 typically I think here in the US) DaveE (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: Novidades para o PLUG e não só
|
|
(...) Eh eh, por mais que concorde contigo, finanças é demais para o meu camiãozinho... e net então nem se fala! :-P (...) Sorry, não conheço ninguém lá. :-( (...) Acho que eles estão por aí... consegui contactá-los pouco antes da reunião do PLUG, (...) (23 years ago, 20-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Novidades para o PLUG e não só
|
|
pronto, já cheguei de férias. e tenho algumas novidades 1- estive a ver o q é preciso para fazer uma página na net, registar o dominio e os preços. então é assim: - o registo do nome (ex.: www.plug.pt) custa +- 17500. - a manutenção do nome custa (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H in Portugal
|
|
(...) Thank you, Kate and Jake. I had noticed that France had been added, so I feared that Lego had forgotten us. But now I realize it is just a question of time until we can use the web shop. We are really looking forward to do it! ;-) Pedro (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H in Portugal
|
|
Posted on behalf of Kate Sutch in Europe: (...) Hi Pedro, Unfortunately LEGO Shop at Home is not available in Portugal and was not planned to be so this year. We are working on getting it up and running in the 1st half of 2002. I will keep you (...) (23 years ago, 18-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
| |
| | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done)
|
|
(...) (snipped) (...) Amazing! I thought by that time (1973) knowledge of history was more widespread... the commentator should have known that NOONE might have helped back in 1906 (or the Chicago Fire for that matter, which I believe was around the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done)
|
|
(...) Not a catch. He's referring to 1906--although, to be honest, that's not much different functionally from mentioning the Chicago Fire. That would definitely be one of those naive points. It's definitely a 1973 production, though. I found more (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
