 | | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) Are you sure about that lip on the windows, Larry? I'm at work right now and can't check, but I seem to recall that the only window that had that annoying protruding bottom lip that interfered with bricks in front was the 1x6x3. I thought the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) I don't worry about it at all. Feel free to speculate, not that you need my permission. I just don't like it when people assert speculative reasoning as the grounds set certain for why a thing cannot be done. That's basically absurd, because (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) I have an original of set 398 and in my version, the 1x1 windows do not have glass backings. -- Thomas Main thomasmain@hotmail.com (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) They're the new ones, not the old ones. They don't have a projecting lip that juts out in front at the bottom, as did the entire old family except the 1x6x3 . If the 1x1 was revived a decision would need to be made whether to revive it exactly (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) It's not a "they" it's a "them". There is a big difference! The group making new molds is not LD. Large complex organizations sometimes have large complex budgeting schemes. Brad has said his organization does not currently have the brief to (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) This has been your standard argument in the past against conjecture and speculation, even when it has been based on intimate knowledge of the industries involved. I've argued quite successfully against your standard argument as being invalid (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) Hmm, I seem to have ordered a bag of white classic 1x2x2 windows from S@H a year or so ago... The thing that can be done with the 1x1x1 classic window which is real nice is to make a decent looking mullioned window. Of course those don't show (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) When I was a kid, new pieces were exciting, and a big reason for buying a set. I remember each Christmas and birthday shopping season begging for certain sets because of the new parts, or existing parts in new colors, that were included. I (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) Alright, this flipped my switch. Now I *have* to respond :-) Your argument that they make new molds for all new lines is valid. But pleace remember that those new lines are to be sold to 'the world'. And in that world, there are an enormous (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set #10021 has been spotted at Shop at Home!
|
|
(...) I think (as Larry P and others have stated) the issue here is not whether the Lego Company can or is willing to reproduce these parts, but rather that 'Lego Direct', the department within Lego whose brief it is to make these Legends, wasn't (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.general)
|
