To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 9151
    Re: Curator for .loc.au —Richie Dulin
   (...) 49 LUGNET members (my description is obsessive), and a few others. Not sure of regular posters though... we'll have to wait for the next noisemakers survey. Or engage in some tedious post counting - wait, I'm obsessive, I'll get on to it (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Curator for .loc.au —Richie Dulin
   (...) In June, there were 38 posters to .loc.au 8 of them were foreigners (or at least seemed to me to be). Of the 30 Australians who posted (and that is more than I thought),5 made more than 10 posts, 5 made between 6 and 10 posts. Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Curator for .loc.au —Stephen Hurn
     (...) What an umm.... interesting fact :P. I guess I was one of the twenty who posted less than 5 times. -stephen hurn (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Curator for .loc.au —Kerry Raymond
     (...) OK, Mr Accountant, give us the full stats! Inquiring minds want to know! Kerry (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Curator for .loc.au —Richie Dulin
     (...) I'm glad you asked! 38 posters with an average of 4.8 posts each (with a standard deviation of 6.2). Those posters who were above average (in terms of number of posts) were: 24.. Mel Brown 23.. Richie Dulin 19.. Kerry Raymond AND Ross Crawford (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Curator for .loc.au —Stephen Hurn
      Did you actually bother to hand count these post or did you use some form of script to do it? (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
     
          Re: Curator for .loc.au —Richie Dulin
      (...) I started it by hand, then I noticed I could get 100 posts on a page (compact format) and cut and paste them into a spreadsheet... Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Curator for .loc.au —Kerry Raymond
      (...) OK, I'll revise my description to Kerry Raymond, less talkative than Mel Kerry (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
     
          Re: Curator for .loc.au —Melody Brown
      (...) HA! nice try grrly ;) I'm not *that* talkative :P ummm... I don't think so anyway... am I? me? nahhhh can't be... impossible... oh and what are we here for anyway? LEGO wasn't it? oh yeah, that's right... LEGO... now where was I... Mel (who is (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Richie Dulin
     (...) Minor correction & some new information There were only 37 posters ... average 4.9 posts, standard deviation of 6.3 I'd missed a duplicate... :-( Interestingly, the split was: 15.. Australian LUGNET members 14.. Australian non-LUGNET members (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Richard Parsons
      (...) I for one had no idea how much I didn't know! I find it rather interesting (and ain't that just what you'd expect from a CA?) Richard Still baldly going... (...) Quite possibly. The International High Conclave of the Brotherhood of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
     
          Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Richie Dulin
      (...) It takes them years to do anything! They've been processing my membership application for *ages*. I'm having to make do with the curatorship of .loc.au in the meantime. (...) Well, that shouldn't be a problem. They manage to process 97.3% of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
     
          Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Ross Crawford
      (...) But what's the approval rate of such applications??? ROSCO (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
     
          Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Richie Dulin
      (...) 102%, but I suspect there may be a statistical error (of at least +/-2%) involved in that calculation. Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
    
         Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Richie Dulin
     (...) No, no, absolutely not! Here's some more good stuff: 30.6% of Australian LUGNET members posted to .loc.au in June BUT only 0.0000007% of Australian non-LUGNET members posted to .loc.au in June AND only 0.0000000013% of the rest of the world (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Kerry Raymond
     (...) Well, I knew I was doing more than my fair share. C'mon you other 70% slackers! Do your share of the postings for a change! :-) Kerry (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
    
         Re: Statistics, Statistics, Statistics (was Re: Curator for .loc.au) —Paul Baulch
     (...) Hey! Two years ago I used to post more than anyone!!! Then I suddenly realised that I was spending too much time posting and not enough time building... ;-) And anyways, whenever I finds sumthin' out and goes to announce it here, I sees that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
   
        Re: Curator for .loc.au —Mark de Kock
   (...) Funny, I thought a lot more foreigners posted in .loc.au? Mark "ofcourse Australians *are* foreigners to me" de Kock (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR