 | | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Yes, it is indeed interpreted out of context, that's what Richard and myself find so funny about it. The best double entendres are completely unintentional. I riff on slips I see all the time, nothing personal... but I ain't gonna stop any (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I've been out of action, and 'NO LONGER' need to contact Melody Brown ASAP! —Melody Brown
|
| | | | | hmmm I dunno if I should giggle or cry :P, how about we just post the message and leave out the Melody Brown bit aye? before the newspapers come knocking on my door and asking for my story hehehe j/k j/k j/k. Well all I can say considering my name (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action...) —Peter White
|
| | | | | (...) Humorous it was, one of the better ones too. Didn't the Argentinian Air Force employ Double Entendres during the Malvinas/ Falklands dispute ? pete.w (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP! —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G8158n.MAq@lugnet.com... (...) apart (...) by (...) it (...) in (...) myself (...) I (...) I wouldn't have minded half as much if you'd tried to put it into the right newsgroup. It (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | .loc.au, light and laid back (Re: double entendres and stuff) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | Good grief Geoffrey, lighten up dude, you're bringing the scene down. You're the guy who posted a rude and abrasive message into the group telling us we'd be ignored until you deemed otherwise, claiming you couldn't think of a better way to meet (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: .loc.au, light and laid back (Re: double entendres and stuff) —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | I'd answer this, only I don't subscribe (and don't plan on ever looking at that group) to o-t.debate, and I really don't think anywhere else would even fit what I want to talk to Richard about, with the exception of email. I would have taken this to (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
