 | | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
Todd, Indeed I did mean org.au my bad. And the rest sounds fine. Regarding auctions, I believe that we do want to be able to post auction announcemnet/updates, but i'd expect that it won't end up being just a marketplace as the auction postings here (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) own (...) So says a man :-) Unless you are on the receiving end of sexism, you probably don't notice it as much. I'm on the receiving end a lot, and so I am somewhat hyper-sensitive. For example, mail and e-mail sent to me by strangers is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Will trade wordsmith position for Sleep
|
|
Hey all, remind me to get sleep before I write the letter to LA. I hope that Todd (and everyone else) understands that I was requesting for the org.au with all the other Org groups (that is..lugnet.org.au). I didn't want us to be the break-away (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) I assume you mean .org.au ? (...) OK, got it. (I assume you mean .org.au, though.) (...) Based on previous discussions, is it correct to assume that this explicitly includes auctions? (...) OK, that's fine. The .loc.us group is similar in that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
Oh dear, I've made a balls-up of this totally. (...) Yep bingo thats it! Lugnet.org.au One more time for the sleepyheads (me) lugnet.org.au (...) I can't, my boss sits in the glass walled office behind me, and it's not even lunch time yet. Still (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) <grin> For starters, no reason to feel like a goose. And secondly - that would be lugnet.org.au - no ".loc" present whatsoever. That's how the US and Canadian org groups work (lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.ca). And finally, go to sleep! :-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat writes(badly): (...) No, actually we request a loc.org.au (misteak #1) (...) No,loc.org.au will be used for discussion (misteak #2) (...) Again, the group will remain as loc.org.au (misteak #3) (...) Ditto, (misteak (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
Shiri, Thanks for pointing this out, Now I feel like a real goose. Apologies I'm on about three hours sleep here. I did intend to mean a loc.org.au and NOT loc.au.org I think I'll e-mail Todd seperately on this one. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: LA gets it's honorable mention
|
|
(...) LOL! I'd say you're lucky in relation to one, and unlucky in the other. (Guess which is which) -Shiri (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
I think I'll butt in just right now. In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat writes a good explanation for creating an NG for Oz orgs. (...) Hmm. There was an issue that came up in the "market splitting" dicussion, and I think it is applicable here. If at (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
