Results 181 – 200 of about 1400.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I've got to champion Todd on this one. He's in a difficult position, given that he's admin of what is not only the most prominent fan site devoted to LEGO, but the *only* one that handles LEGO writ large (FBTB [1] and the like are theme (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|  
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | RE: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) You mean set 5220 "Styling pack" as shown in the second catalogue for 2000 in Australia? It will ONLY be available from: (URL) will 5218, 5219, 5221, and 5222, according to the catalogue. [I'll get the scans of these sets up tonight.] This (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I apoligize for adding to this bandwidth burning, even though I do enjoy a good debate. However, one thing about this bothers me and, for better or worse, I'd just like to throw it out: Will high bidders from the last Auczilla(s) receive their (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I'm just a little confused, I guess. A list of (possible) upcoming set names, set numbers, and prices was posted. TLC asked you to remove them. Are you really saying that if I went over to lugnet.space and said "well, I wonder what set number (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) Actually, I'm also sure that there is no possibility of "availability of everything IN everywhere", but I wish there would be a possibility of "availability of everything TO everywhere". Being a citizen of a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| Richard, (...) trying (...) line of (...) limited (...) You (...) Maybe Chuck was referring to you being in the deep pocket of Larry perhaps? Scott S. -- Soon to be Black & Veatch Employee: (URL) Page -> (URL) LEGO Parts at Great Prices? Visit The (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | RE: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) What about being able to order 'promo sets like the kabaya ones, and any other set available in any market, so you'd be able to get any set in current distribution. Oh, and don't forget the little bit about being available anywhere in the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| (...) [SNIP!!] We have a "charter" for this group, and we still get threads like this. I just don't get it. Personally, I found the tone of the original post to TLC a little unpleasant. But hey, to each his own. I wish you luck. As for the replies, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: Chrome Knights now at LEGO Shop At Home
|
| (...) ....<snip>.... (...) I have had reasonable sucess finding Lego sets (ex. sets 1094, 3069) at Hannafords grocery (URL) have purchased other small sets (like 1068 and 1088) at Tops markets (URL) Farms and Finast are also owned by Tops Markets (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.909)
|
|
| | Re: bulk should mean more than 10
|
| (...) Yes, but overhead is just the problem. Since few people need 50 windows, they wouldn't sell many sets, and the overhead of creating and advertising the package would be divided among fewer sets. There are definite diminishing returns, here. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Well, I'm fairly certain that it doesn't matter much to Lego (in the short term anyway) if you pay full retail price at Wal-Mart or wait for WM to drop them to 50% off to clear them off the shelf. Wal-Mart paid for the sets up front, so the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) I hate to follow myself up, but I thought of something else in this vein: I've spent well over $250 in the past two weeks on Lego. Probably closer to $300. Lego will see none of that money, because it wasn't spent in a store. It was spent on (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Tom, you're right -- on all counts. It *is* ages later (in Internet time); but whether you like it or I like it, there are still parts of the world that move in regular old analog clock time (actually, most of the world does). We try not to be (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Really. Well, those parts certainly moved fast enough to tell you to contact Todd and ask him to remove it. Those parts also certainly moved fast enough to tell you that there was absolutely legal reasoning behind the "request" when Todd asked (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: End of week speculation?
|
| (...) Good question! I have been eagerly awaiting it. Personally, I think it's one of two things: 1) More bricks available via bulk ordering 2) Official announcement of the 2001 Star Wars sets. If this one, I hope it comes with pictures of (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
| (...) I just read the thread - this situation is disgusting. It's bad enough that some scumbag punk (or worse, adult) would steal the photo (and hence the credit for creation) of someone else's model, but for TLC to seemingly regard it as a (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO.new is coming
|
| (...) Hooray. Good news from LD. (...) Sounds good...Don't like the 'limiting the assortment' bit, but getting anything done by TLG for us Aussies is a big effort. Anything would be better than what we've got. (...) Australia ??? (...) So this is (...) (24 years ago, 27-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.908)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
