Results 1301 – 1320 of 1413.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
 | | New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| Dear Brad: Once again some of us in the AFOL community are up in arms about a series of releases that appear to be geographically specific to Germany, or to Europe. I am repeatedly outraged that we AFOL are not promoted to or kept within the loop of (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| | Re: New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| Richard, (...) trying (...) line of (...) limited (...) You (...) Maybe Chuck was referring to you being in the deep pocket of Larry perhaps? Scott S. -- Soon to be Black & Veatch Employee: (URL) Page -> (URL) LEGO Parts at Great Prices? Visit The (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| | Re: New Chrome Castle Sets
|
| (...) [SNIP!!] We have a "charter" for this group, and we still get threads like this. I just don't get it. Personally, I found the tone of the original post to TLC a little unpleasant. But hey, to each his own. I wish you luck. As for the replies, (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| | Re: bulk should mean more than 10
|
| (...) Yes, but overhead is just the problem. Since few people need 50 windows, they wouldn't sell many sets, and the overhead of creating and advertising the package would be divided among fewer sets. There are definite diminishing returns, here. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.201)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.200)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.200)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO.new is coming
|
| (...) Hooray. Good news from LD. (...) Sounds good...Don't like the 'limiting the assortment' bit, but getting anything done by TLG for us Aussies is a big effort. Anything would be better than what we've got. (...) Australia ??? (...) So this is (...) (24 years ago, 27-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.200)
|
|
| | Re: End of week speculation?
|
| (...) Good question! I have been eagerly awaiting it. Personally, I think it's one of two things: 1) More bricks available via bulk ordering 2) Official announcement of the 2001 Star Wars sets. If this one, I hope it comes with pictures of (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.200)
|
|
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
| (...) I just read the thread - this situation is disgusting. It's bad enough that some scumbag punk (or worse, adult) would steal the photo (and hence the credit for creation) of someone else's model, but for TLC to seemingly regard it as a (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Well, I'm fairly certain that it doesn't matter much to Lego (in the short term anyway) if you pay full retail price at Wal-Mart or wait for WM to drop them to 50% off to clear them off the shelf. Wal-Mart paid for the sets up front, so the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | RE: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) What about being able to order 'promo sets like the kabaya ones, and any other set available in any market, so you'd be able to get any set in current distribution. Oh, and don't forget the little bit about being available anywhere in the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) I hate to follow myself up, but I thought of something else in this vein: I've spent well over $250 in the past two weeks on Lego. Probably closer to $300. Lego will see none of that money, because it wasn't spent in a store. It was spent on (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Really. Well, those parts certainly moved fast enough to tell you to contact Todd and ask him to remove it. Those parts also certainly moved fast enough to tell you that there was absolutely legal reasoning behind the "request" when Todd asked (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Tom, you're right -- on all counts. It *is* ages later (in Internet time); but whether you like it or I like it, there are still parts of the world that move in regular old analog clock time (actually, most of the world does). We try not to be (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Strange pricing: 4222 vs 4288
|
| In TRU there are two similar "Classic" building sets, 4222 and 4288. 4288 is the "Red Bucket" and 4222 is a box. 4288 contains 400 pcs. and 4222 contains 355 pcs. The part selection in both sets is similar; the notable difference is that 4222 has a (...) (24 years ago, 12-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.199)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) One such example would be the Y-Wing+TIE set featuring Darth Vader on the box cover. It was the only source for that figure for over a year until the figure sets came out. The number of Y-Wing set sold would be greatly reduced if the figure (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.198)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
