 | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Steve Bliss
|
| | | In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott A wrote: [snipped one-liner] Scott, Was there any point to your response, other than scoring a cheap shot? My take on Brad's latest posting is this: it's common for technical projects (new software, new web pages, etc) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Yes, I thought I'd get it in early before all the sycophants woke up. Do you always point out pointless posts, or is it just that I have dared to question the great one? (...) A deadline is a deadline. When I am expected to meet a deadline, I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | "Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qAoF.I02@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) question (...) Why are you making a personal attack on Steve when he made a valid observation on your comments? (...) common (...) all (...) Sure, deadlines (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | (...) I thought he was expressing disatisfaction with Lego in general. I don't entirely agree with him, but I thought the cheap shot was the above response. (...) In my judgment Steve made the personal attack. It's nice that a Lego representative is (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Sorry, I did not mean to have my comments construed as a personal attack. I 100% accept that my post was rather pointless, my reply to Steve was meant to be a rhetorical question which infers that my post was not the only pointless one on (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | (...) OK. One more time. Let's all remember this, the offical party line is: Send me all your Lego pieces. There, that should do it. Let's party. -- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K -- (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) TK, just need a clarification-- do we send all of our LEGO to *you*, or is the party line an admonition to the world to send *us* their LEGO? (...) Speaking of a good time, I was just thinking about how nice it will be in AZ pretty soon-- I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The key word there is "me". As in ME. I'm not greedy, but I'll take all you got. (...) I HOPE it's nice pretty soon. Right now it's just @%*$# HOT! -- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K -- (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G13yq6.JoM@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) Ahem, as in fighting over left-over Technic ;-) (...) AZ (...) Well, I now live in a place where the weather is about as erratic as, well, (for (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well it could be worse, it could be that you *do* look good in leggings :-P Jude Esther in 12 days! (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in message news:G140DH.2DD@lugnet.com... (...) well, (...) rather (...) sing (...) :-P LOL!! Its time for Geraldo! Look, I found a quarter... (...) Woohoo! :) -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qIz0.MGG@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) to (...) pointless (...) No worries, Scott. That's how I saw [your post] at least, not to say that others didn't see it differently. And yes, there are many (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Looks like you missed it by two. (...) Rarely - I'd spend too much time posting followups to myself. (...) Nope, that's not it, either. Not that you questioned anyone. John Neal's post is a much better response than I'll ever be able to write. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
