 | | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) What was the point of your post, Richard? To make fun of Tim because he didn't know that TLC wouldn't respond in a timely manner? Or to take the opportunity to take another shot at Brad? Didn't your mother ever tell you that if you don't have (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) I went there, but apparently more pocket change is needed: There was an internal error on the server in processing this request. -Tom McD. when replying, most restaurant servers have internal errors processing spamcake requests. (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) You mean Brad didn't just fire back a quick and timely response to your query? Gee, will wonders never cease...and you were polite and everything too! What was the point of your being on Lugnet again, Brad? -- Richard (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Studios does NOT run on Win2000 (was: movie maker in stock)
|
|
(...) Well, I just got off the phone with tech support. The LEGO Studios SW/Camera does not work under Windows 2000. Only on Win98 (second edition) and the new Windows Millennium. The S@H catalog is lying when it says it will run on Win2000 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Website has problems, too TIME consuming for mom's, Catalog beef!!!
|
|
(...) <snipped> because I don't even have time to bother with the website after all the problems I've been hearing about (...) I'm glad you wrote this message. I would find it hard to believe that LEGO doesn't realize that MOMS are the primary (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Website has problems, too TIME consuming for mom's, Catalog beef!!!
|
|
Catalog Beef After several tries we are STILL waiting for a Fall Lego catalog! I would think with the amount of money our household spends at S@H we would at least get a catalog sent to us. The last time I called S@H, the gal stated that I would (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
If they don't offer, ask them to reimburse you for your expenses plus a little extra for your time. Take it in LEGO sets if they'd prefer it to cash. (...) and (...) database (...) domains, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
(...) It is speculation at this point based upon info from this post: (URL) , and from the observation that minimal effort is being put into the 9 volt line. It appears to me at least that the 9 volt line has been riding the coattails of sets (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Are the new Duplo trains a sign?
|
|
John Neal wrote in message <39D6E68E.DFB8BEE8@u...st.net>... (...) hope--that (...) line (...) enthusiasts (...) exceed (...) something (...) How do we know that they are abandoning the 9V line? What do you think is the possibility that they will (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
