 | | Re: the latest news
|
|
(...) Jeez sorry, whats your freakin problem. It makes sense to me to ask for what you want (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Orders Online DB: useful?
|
|
Randy Anchikoski wrote in message ... (...) I think that this database would be beneficial for requesting lost or missing parts also. Whenever I request parts from customer service they do not have the ability to reference parts by the number (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Orders Online DB: useful?
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) This idea would: 1. Provide a wokable and reasonably democratic marketing tool for TLG to probe the market demands. 2. Reduce the amount of "please", "can't we have this or that" and nagging mails. 3. Possible disadvantage: Could (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Window questions for Brad Justus
|
|
(Reprint from a post buried in the "the latest news" topic in lugnet.lego.direct). Hi Brad, and thanks. I do have one question for you about Bulk Sales. Have the classic LEGO window/door molds (known as #214 1-10 in the old 50's and 60's catalogs) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Bulk Orders Online DB: useful?
|
|
With the ability to purchase many of a single element directly from TLG in the not-to-distant future, I had the idea of developing an on-line database to track demand for an individual element. My initial idea was to simply take online requests (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
| |
| | Re: the latest news
|
|
Yeah, I bet if we made a big enough fuss, they would do the ultimate and just drop the whole bulk ordering thing. (...) Paul Foster (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the latest news
|
|
Hi Brad, and thanks. I do have one serious question for you about Bulk Sales. Have the classic LEGO window/door molds (known as #214 1-10 in the old 50's and 60's catalogs) been destroyed? Or are they still available for use? I know that #214/6 (2x2 (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
| |
| | Re: the latest news
|
|
I bet if we made a fuss, we could get any element in any color, ie bright green bricks, clear arches, trans red plates... I havent been able to think of anything but this since I heard the news. It would be so cool to get anything in any color, even (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the latest news
|
|
(...) The ratings indicate a reaction and collective recommendation to read. In the .lego.* groups, which are primarily intended as a communications link to the LEGO Comapny (.lego.direct in paricular), their primary reason for existing is to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: the latest news
|
|
(...) Here here. I agree with Lar. It is nice to see that the "deep pocket" people may come in usefull after all. Especially after the recent upheaval involving the "haves" and the "have nots". Gary Istok (24 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
